🗞️ Story file #1640
Congressman supports impeachment of Pete Hegseth
Nov 9, 3 PM ET to Nov 9, 6 PM ET
- 16outlets carried it
- 🫏5 · 5 · 6🐘left · center · right
- 3 hourson the front pages
- 29front pages at once, at its peak
- 9 minof TV captions
- 7people retold it online
- 1fact-check
- 5 of 8parts of a saga
📰 read it at:
The Guardian
The New Republic
NBC News
The Washington Post
USA Today
BBC
Bloomberg
Newsweek
Reuters
The Hill
Just the News
Washington Examiner
New York Post
Newsmax
Red State
The Gateway Pundit
👣 How this story traveled: from the front pages that broke it, out through TV, radio and the shows, into what people retold and what fact-checkers examined, and on into the saga it is part of. Everything here is matched to the story by our tools, so a link can be wrong; the trackers' pages say how each is made.
- Nov 9, 3 PM ETfirst on a front page: The New Republic
- Nov 9, 3 PM ETfirst on TV: BBC News
- Nov 9, 4 PM ETpeak: on 29 front pages
- Nov 10, 5 AM ETretold online by 7 people
📰 Spread
the front pages that ran it, hour by hour
💬 Quoted
- “hard yes”13
- “Pete Hegseth has got to go”3
- “we are not worried”2
- “holding the crooks accountable”1
- “High crimes and misdemeanors”1
phrases its headlines put in quotation marks; the bar is how many outlets did
📌 Linked by aggregators
1 Political Wire
aggregators linking to it from their front page (they don't count as outlets covering it)
✏️ 1 outlet ran more than one headline on it (reworded, or a follow-up)
- The Hill (2 wordings): “Hegseth plans press conference, says he’s ‘not worried’ about impeachment ...” → “Hegseth plans press conference, says he’s ‘not worried’ about impeachment push”
📰 Every outlet's headline 16left to right by AllSides rating
The Guardian🕒 Nov 9, 8 AM ET
Hakeem Jeffries supports impeachment of Pete Hegseth: ‘He has got to go’
The New Republic🕒 Nov 9, 3 PM ET
Republican Congressman Forces Vote on Impeaching Pete Hegseth
NBC News🕒 Nov 9, 6 AM ET
Hakeem Jeffries says he’s a ‘hard yes’ on impeaching Pete Hegseth
The Washington Post🕒 Nov 8, 3 PM ET
Top House Democrat says he’s a ‘hard yes’ on Pete Hegseth impeachment
USA Today🕒 Nov 9, 11 AM ET
Congress is back today. Expect action on impeaching Pete Hegseth
BBC🕒 Nov 8, 3 PM ET
Top House Democrat 'a hard yes' on impeaching Hegseth
Bloomberg🕒 Nov 8, 1 PM ET
Hegseth Impeachment Backed by Democratic Leader Jeffries
Newsweek🕒 Nov 8, 1 PM ET
Jeffries Backs Republican-Led Hegseth Impeachment Effort: He’s ‘Got to Go’
Reuters🕒 Nov 9, 2 PM ET
Hegseth plays down impeachment risks, says ready to defend his record
The Hill🕒 Nov 9, 2 PM ET
Hegseth plans press conference, says he’s ‘not worried’ about impeachment ...
Just the News🕒 Nov 9, 9 AM ET
Hakeem Jeffries says he is a 'hard yes' for Hegseth impeachment
Washington Examiner🕒 Nov 8, 1 PM ET
Jeffries a ‘hard yes’ on Hegseth impeachment vote
New York Post🕒 Nov 8, 4 PM ET
Hakeem Jeffries gloats he’s a ‘hard yes’ on another Trump admin impeachment
Newsmax🕒 Nov 8, 7 PM ET
Jeffries: 'I'm a Hard Yes' on Impeaching Hegseth
Red State🕒 Nov 8, 12 PM ET
Jeffries: Hard Yes to Impeach Hegseth, Hard No to Working With Miller — Let the Overstepping Begin
The Gateway Pundit🕒 Nov 9, 3 PM ET
Hegseth Says He Will Hold Press Briefing to Address Incoming Impeachment Attempt (VIDEO)
📡 Broadcast
TV, radio, and the shows that talked about it
- left
- center
- right
📺 On TV
minutes its captions were on screen, by channel; the disc is the network's lean
📻 On the radio
hourly newscasts that carried it, by show; beside the count, how often it was the lead story, or the highest it came in the running order
📻🤷 No radio newscast matched to it.
🎙️ On the shows
podcasts, newsletters and streams that talked about it, by show; the bar is episodes; the disc is the show's lean by reputation
🕵️ Investigated, joked about
🕵️ investigative reporting on it and 🃏 satire joking about it (jokes, never counted as coverage); the bar is pieces
🕵️🤷 No investigator or satirist matched to it yet.
🧶 Retelling
what people online made of it
🧩 How it's being told
The stories under this news, from our motif index, and who told each: the shows we follow by their lean, people online, fact-checkers. A story people tell, not a claim that it's true; claims are matched to this story by our tools, so a link can be wrong.
- 🧩 Not a criminal trial
🧶 online
“Impeachment is a political process for addressing abuses of office rather than a criminal trial.”
🧶 Retold online
- Impeachment is a political process for addressing abuses of office rather than a criminal trial. Nov 10: told by 7 people
🦋 Widely seen on Bluesky
🦋 a post on Bluesky · 12 likes, 0 reposts
🦋 a post on Bluesky · 6 likes, 4 reposts
🧩 Not a criminal trial
On Folklore: the latest in full, with their motifs and who is telling them.
Hakeem JeffriesHouse DemocratsDemocratic LeaderHegsethImpeachment Resolution
🔎 Checking
what the fact-checkers looked into
🧵 Persistence
the running story it belongs to
🧵 House impeachment of Hegseth
Trump reaffirms intent to keep Hegseth in Cabinet
Nov 4, 5 PM ET
Rep. Massie threatens impeachment of Pete Hegseth over Iran war fallout
Nov 5, 1 PM ET
Defense Secretary vows to fight impeachment
Nov 7, 6 AM ET
Defense Secretary faces impeachment vote as early as next week
Nov 6, 1 AM ET
Congressman supports impeachment of Pete Hegseth (this story)
Nov 9, 3 PM ET
Rep. Massie introduces articles of impeachment against Hegseth
Nov 9, 3 PM ET
House Democrats missed impeachment vote due to DC traffic
Nov 11, 11 AM ET
House blocks impeachment bid against Hegseth
Nov 6, 11 AM ET