← the whole motif index

🧩 BND Motif Index · M1880

Bait and switch

A side that won on voters' costs is said never to have meant it: once in power it drops prices for hearings, impeachments and prosecutions of its enemies, so the kitchen-table campaign was the bait and the revenge is the switch. Accountability is affordability answers it.

πŸ—£οΈ ArgumentsπŸ—‚οΈ Political PerformanceπŸ—‚οΈ PocketbookπŸ—‚οΈ Accountability

⚠️ A story people tell, not a claim that it's true.

A motif is the shape of a story as its tellers tell it, named the way a folklorist names a tale type, so the same story told about other people, by the other side or in another year lands in the same place. Some of the claims below are true, many are false. Arguing against a story is often a story of its own, its answer (Voter fraud is answered by Voter suppression, Lawfare by No one is above the law), and we file it there; where no answer has a motif yet, the arguments against a story sit with its tellings.

πŸͺœ Its family

what it rests on, what rests on it, and the motifs that answer it

↔️ answers and mirrors:

πŸŽ™οΈ Who it came up with

the shows we follow where its claims came up (1 left-leaning, 0 center, 11 right-leaning so far), colored by the show's lean; the bar is how many of its claims each one heard

  1. 🐘 The Dan Bongino Show 2 claims
  2. 🐘 The Mark Levin Show 2 claims
  3. 🐘 Timcast IRL (podcast) 2 claims
  4. 🐘 Bannon's War Room 1 claim
  5. 🐘 Clay Travis & Buck Sexton 1 claim
  6. 🐘 Fox News Rundown 1 claim
  7. 🐘 Morning Wire 1 claim
  8. 🐘 Ruthless 1 claim
  9. 🐘 The Jesse Kelly Show 1 claim
  10. 🫏 The Young Turks (podcast) 1 claim
  11. 🐘 Verdict with Ted Cruz 1 claim
  12. 🐘 Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words 1 claim

"Came up on" means one of its claims was heard on the show: told, reported or argued against. We don't yet mark which. Show leans are our own grouping of the shows we transcribe.

πŸ—£οΈ In so many words

the words that carry it

πŸ’¬ the tellers' own words: β€œDems have already started to pivot from affordability to we're going to get our political enemies.” β€œI thought they were going to focus on affordability. Good luck with that. They changed like that. It didn't even take a day.” β€œThe Democrats have no intention of addressing affordability... They're going to spend the next two years trying to destroy Trump” β€œthey're not focused on any of the things they promised you”

🧢 Its claims

what's been told in this shape, in our words, by who told it: newest first in each; a claim's dots are the shows it came up on, in their lean's color (point at them for their names)

Told on the left 0

claims heard on left-leaning shows, and no right-leaning one

πŸ¦— No claim heard only on the left so far.

Told on the right 2

claims heard on right-leaning shows, and no left-leaning one

  • 2026-11-11 β€œCongress lacks the constitutional authority to conduct investigations for the purpose of discovering crimes.” 2
  • 2026-11-09 β€œDemocrats are said to be pivoting from affordability to investigating political enemies; Democrats say the investigations tie corruption to higher prices.” 1

Told on both sides 1

claims heard on left- and right-leaning shows alike

  • 2026-11-10 β€œDemocrats intend to spend their time trying to destroy Donald Trump and his presidency.” 12

M1880 Β· first seen 2026-11-10 Β· last 2026-11-09 Β· what this is Β· how the index works