← the whole motif index

🧩 BND Motif Index · M1806

Security risk

An official said to belong to the enemy is cast as a danger once seated: the office would hand him the nation's secrets, its committees and its clearance, so he must be screened, barred or kept out.

🎭 ArchetypesπŸ—‚οΈ Betrayal and Loyalty

⚠️ A story people tell, not a claim that it's true.

A motif is the shape of a story as its tellers tell it, named the way a folklorist names a tale type, so the same story told about other people, by the other side or in another year lands in the same place. Some of the claims below are true, many are false. Arguing against a story is often a story of its own, its answer (Voter fraud is answered by Voter suppression, Lawfare by No one is above the law), and we file it there; where no answer has a motif yet, the arguments against a story sit with its tellings.

πŸͺœ Its family

what it rests on, what rests on it, and the motifs that answer it

πŸͺœ rests on 🧩 Brotherhood candidate

πŸ”— goes with: 🧩 Manchurian candidate

πŸŽ™οΈ Who it came up with

the shows we follow where its claims came up (4 left-leaning, 2 center, 7 right-leaning so far), colored by the show's lean; the bar is how many of its claims each one heard

  1. 🐘 The Mark Levin Show 4 claims
  2. 🐘 The Dan Bongino Show 3 claims
  3. 🐘 Clay Travis & Buck Sexton 2 claims
  4. 🐘 The Megyn Kelly Show 2 claims
  5. 🐘 Verdict with Ted Cruz 2 claims
  6. 🐘 Bannon's War Room 1 claim
  7. βš–οΈ BBC Global News Podcast 1 claim
  8. 🫏 HasanAbi (podcast) 1 claim
  9. βš–οΈ NPR Politics Podcast 1 claim
  10. 🫏 Pod Save America 1 claim
  11. 🐘 The Jesse Kelly Show 1 claim
  12. 🫏 The Young Turks (podcast) 1 claim
βž• 1 more show

πŸŽ™οΈ 1 more shows

  1. 🫏 Today in Focus (Guardian) 1 claim

"Came up on" means one of its claims was heard on the show: told, reported or argued against. We don't yet mark which. Show leans are our own grouping of the shows we transcribe.

πŸ“° In the news

the stories its claims were told about, the most told first (matched by our tools, so a link can be wrong)

πŸ—£οΈ In so many words

the words that carry it

πŸ’¬ the tellers' own words: β€œThe denial blocks him from any session that involves sensitive national security information.” β€œThe failure leaves open the question of what specific issues prevented approval.”

🧢 Its claims

what's been told in this shape, in our words, by who told it: newest first in each; a claim's dots are the shows it came up on, in their lean's color (point at them for their names)

Told on the left 0

claims heard on left-leaning shows, and no right-leaning one

πŸ¦— No claim heard only on the left so far.

Told on the right 5

claims heard on right-leaning shows, and no left-leaning one

  • 2026-11-02 β€œAbdul El-Sayed is a national security problem and a Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer.” 1
  • 2026-11-02 β€œAbdul El-Sayed's biggest donor is said to be his father-in-law, a top elder of a Muslim Brotherhood-linked organization.” 1
  • 2026-10-29 β€œAbdul El-Sayed is called a national security risk with a questionable past, said to be bought by the Muslim Brotherhood and funded by donors tied to Hamas.” 1
  • 2026-10-23 β€œAbdul Al-Sayed poses an acute security risk due to connections to the Muslim Brotherhood.” 2
  • 2026-10-23 β€œAbdul El-Sayed, running for the Senate in Michigan, is tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hasan Piker.” 1

Told on both sides 2

claims heard on left- and right-leaning shows alike

  • 2026-10-30 β€œAbdul El-Sayed is a lifelong supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist organization.” 8
  • 2026-10-26 β€œTrump calls Abdul El-Sayed a jihadist and questions his ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.” 7

Fact-checked 1

claims a fact-checker examined: the verdict is theirs, behind the link

  • 2026-11-10 β€œAbdul El-Sayed is said to have failed the background check for classified Senate briefings, barring him from sensitive national security meetings.” πŸ”Ž Snopes

M1806 Β· first seen 2026-11-09 Β· last 2026-11-10 Β· what this is Β· how the index works