โ† the whole motif index

๐Ÿงฉ BND Motif Index ยท M1313

Even their own side says so

A charge is said to be beyond partisan dismissal because the accused's own camp raised or confirmed it first, the probe opened under their president or their own paper reported it, so it can't be called a witch hunt.

๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Arguments๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ Bad faith

โš ๏ธ A story people tell, not a claim that it's true.

A motif is the shape of a story as its tellers tell it, named the way a folklorist names a tale type, so the same story told about other people, by the other side or in another year lands in the same place. Some of the claims below are true, many are false. Arguing against a story is often a story of its own, its answer (Voter fraud is answered by Voter suppression, Lawfare by No one is above the law), and we file it there; where no answer has a motif yet, the arguments against a story sit with its tellings.

๐Ÿชœ Its family

what it rests on, what rests on it, and the motifs that answer it

โ†”๏ธ answers and mirrors:

๐Ÿ”— goes with: ๐Ÿงฉ Where there's smoke, there's fire

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Who it came up with

the shows we follow where its claims came up (1 left-leaning, 0 center, 3 right-leaning so far), colored by the show's lean; the bar is how many of its claims each one heard

  1. ๐Ÿซ David Pakman Show (podcast) 1 claim
  2. ๐Ÿ˜ The Dan Bongino Show 1 claim
  3. ๐Ÿ˜ The Megyn Kelly Show 1 claim
  4. ๐Ÿ˜ Timcast IRL (podcast) 1 claim

"Came up on" means one of its claims was heard on the show: told, reported or argued against. We don't yet mark which. Show leans are our own grouping of the shows we transcribe.

๐Ÿ“ฐ In the news

the stories its claims were told about, the most told first (matched by our tools, so a link can be wrong)

๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ In so many words

the words that carry it

๐Ÿ’ฌ the tellers' own words: โ€œIt's one thing when Democrats say it. It's one thing when left wingers say it. But I am talking about some of the most hardcore defenders of Trumpโ€ โ€œObama admin first launched the investigationโ€ โ€œThe New York Times, of all places, confirming the federal investigationโ€ โ€œthere is a vulnerability of the votes when they're transferred from the polling places to the county headquartersโ€ โ€œWho was sitting at the top of government in the summer of 2016 when this took place? Oh yeah, that was Barack Obama.โ€

๐Ÿงถ Its claims

what's been told in this shape, in our words, by who told it: newest first in each; a claim's dots are the shows it came up on, in their lean's color (point at them for their names)

Told on the left 1

claims heard on left-leaning shows, and no right-leaning one

  • 2026-11-07 โ€œThe Trump era is over: voters said screw you to Trump, his coalition has collapsed, and a Republican Congress gets almost nothing done.โ€ 1

Told on the right 2

claims heard on right-leaning shows, and no left-leaning one

  • 2026-11-02 โ€œMark Ruffalo warns that vote tallies sent over the internet are vulnerable; a host says the leftist actor inadvertently made the case for the SAVE Act.โ€ 1
  • 2026-10-30 โ€œThe Obama administration investigated and found evidence that Ilhan Omar's marriage was fraudulent.โ€ 2

M1313 ยท first seen 2026-10-30 ยท what this is ยท how the index works